[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"norm-gii-stpo-257b":3},{"law":4,"norm_id":13,"norm_key":14,"slug":15,"title":16,"chapter":17,"content":18,"enriched_content":19,"hierarchy":20,"neighbors_before":23,"neighbors_after":36,"citing_decisions":49,"is_thin":101},{"abbreviation":5,"title":6,"source_type":7,"jurisdiction":8,"document_kind":9,"language":8,"attribution":10,"version_date":11,"source_url":12},"stpo","Strafprozeßordnung","gii","de","statute","Quelle: Gesetze im Internet (www.gesetze-im-internet.de), gemeinfrei gem. § 5 UrhG","1950-09-12","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gesetze-im-internet.de\u002Fstpo\u002Fxml.zip",1279962,"§ 257b","257b","Erörterung des Verfahrensstands mit den Verfahrensbeteiligten","Hauptverhandlung","Das Gericht kann in der Hauptverhandlung den Stand des Verfahrens mit den Verfahrensbeteiligten erörtern, soweit dies geeignet erscheint, das Verfahren zu fördern.","STPO - Verfahren im ersten Rechtszug - Hauptverhandlung - § 257b Erörterung des Verfahrensstands mit den Verfahrensbeteiligten\n\nDas Gericht kann in der Hauptverhandlung den Stand des Verfahrens mit den Verfahrensbeteiligten erörtern, soweit dies geeignet erscheint, das Verfahren zu fördern.",{"buch":21,"abschnitt":22},"Zweites Buch","Sechster Abschnitt",[24,28,32],{"norm_key":25,"title":26,"slug":27},"§ 257a","Form von Anträgen und Anregungen zu Verfahrensfragen","257a",{"norm_key":29,"title":30,"slug":31},"§ 257","Befragung des Angeklagten und Erklärungsrechte nach einer Beweiserhebung","257",{"norm_key":33,"title":34,"slug":35},"§ 256","Verlesung der Erklärungen von Behörden und Sachverständigen","256",[37,41,45],{"norm_key":38,"title":39,"slug":40},"§ 257c","Verständigung zwischen Gericht und Verfahrensbeteiligten","257c",{"norm_key":42,"title":43,"slug":44},"§ 258","Schlussvorträge; Recht des letzten Wortes","258",{"norm_key":46,"title":47,"slug":48},"§ 259","Dolmetscher","259",[50,57,62,67,72,77,82,87,92,97],{"title":51,"ecli":52,"leitsatz":53,"date":54,"source_url":55,"source_type":56},"BGH, Beschl. v. 07.02.2023 – 1 StR 253\u002F22","ECLI:DE:BGH:2023:070223B1STR253.22.0",null,"2023-02-07","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\u002Fjportal\u002Fdocs\u002Fbsjrs\u002Fjb-KORE618682023.zip","rechtsprechung",{"title":58,"ecli":59,"leitsatz":53,"date":60,"source_url":61,"source_type":56},"BGH, Urt. v. 14.07.2022 – 3 StR 455\u002F21","ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:140722U3STR455.21.0","2022-07-14","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\u002Fjportal\u002Fdocs\u002Fbsjrs\u002Fjb-KORE602502022.zip",{"title":63,"ecli":64,"leitsatz":53,"date":65,"source_url":66,"source_type":56},"BGH, Beschl. v. 28.09.2021 – 5 StR 140\u002F21","ECLI:DE:BGH:2021:280921B5STR140.21.0","2021-09-28","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\u002Fjportal\u002Fdocs\u002Fbsjrs\u002Fjb-KORE651392021.zip",{"title":68,"ecli":69,"leitsatz":53,"date":70,"source_url":71,"source_type":56},"BGH, Beschl. v. 16.06.2021 – 1 StR 92\u002F21","ECLI:DE:BGH:2021:160621B1STR92.21.0","2021-06-16","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\u002Fjportal\u002Fdocs\u002Fbsjrs\u002Fjb-KORE602152021.zip",{"title":73,"ecli":74,"leitsatz":53,"date":75,"source_url":76,"source_type":56},"BGH, Beschl. v. 02.06.2021 – 1 StR 44\u002F21","ECLI:DE:BGH:2021:020621B1STR44.21.0","2021-06-02","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\u002Fjportal\u002Fdocs\u002Fbsjrs\u002Fjb-KORE644512021.zip",{"title":78,"ecli":79,"leitsatz":53,"date":80,"source_url":81,"source_type":56},"BGH, Beschl. v. 19.11.2019 – 1 StR 162\u002F19","ECLI:DE:BGH:2019:191119B1STR162.19.0","2019-11-19","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\u002Fjportal\u002Fdocs\u002Fbsjrs\u002Fjb-KORE634252019.zip",{"title":83,"ecli":84,"leitsatz":53,"date":85,"source_url":86,"source_type":56},"BGH, Beschl. v. 23.07.2019 – 1 StR 2\u002F19","ECLI:DE:BGH:2019:230719B1STR2.19.1","2019-07-23","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\u002Fjportal\u002Fdocs\u002Fbsjrs\u002Fjb-KORE607022019.zip",{"title":88,"ecli":89,"leitsatz":53,"date":90,"source_url":91,"source_type":56},"BGH, Urt. v. 05.07.2017 – 2 StR 526\u002F15","ECLI:DE:BGH:2017:050717U2STR526.15.0","2017-07-05","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\u002Fjportal\u002Fdocs\u002Fbsjrs\u002Fjb-KORE623212017.zip",{"title":93,"ecli":94,"leitsatz":53,"date":95,"source_url":96,"source_type":56},"BVerfG, Nichtannahmebeschluss v. 16.02.2016 – 2 BvR 107\u002F16","ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:rk20160216.2bvr010716","2016-02-16","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\u002Fjportal\u002Fdocs\u002Fbsjrs\u002Fjb-KVRE412981601.zip",{"title":98,"ecli":53,"leitsatz":53,"date":99,"source_url":100,"source_type":56},"BGH, Beschl. v. 12.11.2015 – 5 StR 467\u002F15","2015-11-12","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\u002Fjportal\u002Fdocs\u002Fbsjrs\u002Fjb-JURE150018432.zip",false]